/vintage andpop

Celebrities Say the Darndest Things: Wilmer Valderama Comes to Lindsay Lohan’s Defence Following Failed Alcohol Test

Posted on June 25, 2011 by

Just when you thought he fell of the face of this earth, Wilmer Valderama comes back to give everyone a piece of his mind regarding none other than ex-girlfriend Lindsay Lohan. And boy does he sound pissed.

Following Lohan’s latest scandal – the hard-partying actress just nearly escaped a jail sentence on Wednesday after failing an alcohol test yet again on – her ever-loyal ex made it very clear that he still believes Lohan should be given another chance. Right, because the last 576 ones weren’t enough. Okay, slight exaggeration, but you get the point.

“Sometimes people have to go through things,” Valderama told People Magazine at the “Cars 2″ Premier. “We all understand that, and we all deserve a second chance. I’m not worried about her at all. I think she’s going to get through this because she is ridiculously talented. When you love once, you always will, and you have to care.”

The couple broke up back in 2004, when Lohan was 18 and Valderama 24 – just around her Confessions of a Teenage Drama Queen and Mean Girls days – so it’s a wonder why he is coming out of obscurity now to make this statement. However, it is kind of sweet that he still cares so much about her – after all, she was quite a catch once upon a time!

As must as she seems more and more of a lost cause with every passing day, we can’t help but hope that maybe Valderama is right, and that this phase – if you could even still call it that after all this years – will pass and we will be able to see Lohan once again, doing what she does best and using her talents for good.

Until then, we know where to find you – on the rooftop of your Venice beach home behind the bamboo fence you just put up so that paparazzi can’t take pictures of you doing things you don’t want your parole officer to find out about. Smart tactic!

 

Search

Related Posts

  • Daniel Sillitto

    I totally agree. Letterman was such a prick. I guess he forgot that without the viewers there wouldn’t have been a show. Shows are paid by advertisers and advertisers don’t invest in shows which no one watches. A little bit more respect and gratitude please for choosing to watch this 9 years when I could have just watch any other show.

  • cesue

    Well Letterman is a jerk period. Clearly he never watched the show. As for the actors defending the ending, of course they are. They want to work again and won’t publicly say so soon after the end that they disagreed with the outcome even if they did–there are afterall also DVD/Blu-Ray sales of the last season to contend with. The reality is that this ending was rushed and ultimately as much as they are selling it as ‘innovative’ basically just became a “Friends” rehash the second that they made Ted the pathetic, love-struck loser (Ross), Robin the self-centered, princess, obsessed with her career (Rachel), and Barney (the guy who tries with one girl to really commit, fails, so is therefore destined to be a hopeless player). It wasn’t ‘new’ its was rehashed garbage and that was upsetting. I had no problems really with them killing off the mother–it is sad that we got like 5 minutes of relationship after 9 years, but alas the death was fine. The issue is that Ted went back to Robin like the lovesick, pathetic loser that he always was. Perhaps in the early conception of the show it was understandable why Robin was such an it girl, but in the same manner that one didn’t quite understand what was so endearing about Rachel and why two friends would risk their friendship for the show-proclaimed ‘it girl’, there was nothing about Robin that ultimately screamed out yeah I can see why two best friends would be passing this girl back in forth between one another for the better part of a decade.